Seventh777Sevens

 If after we reign in a left Anarchist society there is still god forbid, division , hostility and resentment ,then I would support Pan Secessionism .  Pan Secessionism would be a unique way to unite persons if the above changes won’t work,  see this for more .  .Maybe there would be a human rights model in such a Pan Secessionist society based on  this line  of thinking on human rights There would be no deification of “progress” in a universalist context in this Pan Secessionist society There is a case to be made that targets of hostility, resentment and especially violence would way more easily be able to relocate to escape such hostility, resentment and especially violence in a more localist world (though obviously as mentioned above they ideally should not need to do that) These include radical localized autonomous zones . As a kid and teen in the 1980s and 1990s, (and to a extremely much lesser extent in in 2007, and in the late 2010s early 2...

Support all states/governments ,classes and hierarchies on Earth to be abolished to create a stateless , classless, heiarchyless and thus inclusive, egalitarian world.  This includes wanting the state of Israel to be abolished and me not wanting any Palestinian state to be created. This is line with the wishes of Left Wing Jews like Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, Béla Kun, Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman. See  this  for more ( This would basically be similar to a  no state solution  where Israelis and Palestinians live in a stateless society (well technically it is a no state solution by its very nature) .  fused with mutual aide international solidarism , alter intersectionality  for Jews over all the world

 On nationalism Nationality isn’t real, material conditions are. Nationality is self-referentially cultural —- one belongs to a nation because one perceives oneself or is perceived to belong there. But material conditions are objective: one is proletarian or bourgeoisie regardless of whether one believes oneself to be. There are clear conditions for being proletarian or bourgeoisie, whereas ethnicities or nationalities are neither sufficiently clear nor consistent. Being “working class” isn’t an identity, it’s a state of being. You can’t just choose not to be working class. National identities are "real" to the extent they're believed in, sure, but these identities emerge from and are shaped by the underlying material forces at work: that of capitalist production and reproduction. National identities are also constantly in flux in bourgeois (i.e. capitalist) societies, and cosmopolitanism emerges as the predominant character of production everywhere in the world. This is ...

A John Bolton ideology that is not neoconservative, imperialist, or even a colonialist or globalist. A John Bolton ideology which favors foreign intervention, at least a lot more so than most conservatives , liberals, centrists etc, but that is just the only issue where he agrees with neocons.  This John Bolton ideology strongly supports national sovereignty and is against efforts by international organizations to take away or redefine sovereignty.  Per these articles, this John Bolton ideology is more nationalist than globalist (even railing against globalism by name):  here  and  here  Also, this John Bolton ideology is vehemently opposed to the EU,  here ,  here ,  here  and it supports Brexit. Globalists think that this John Bolton ideology is not one of them, see  here Because of all this, this John Bolton ideology is a  Vaush ian     Left   Wing   Interventionist     Social Con...

  Left (Super) Capitalist   Post Liberal-tarianism NRx Dual economy :  Everyone rules over Government Proudhon mutualism  AND  Nationalizing unionism of Peronism   Ergatocracy  fused with PJ Proudon personable Anarcho Libertarianism : “Whoever lays his /her hand on me to govern me is a usurper and tyrant, and I declare him/her my enemy.” Pierre-Joseph Proudhon other parts of this ideogy:  To quote Max Stirner, "agitation might rather be declared against establishment itself, the State, not a particular State, not any such thing as the mere condition of the State at the time; it is not another State (e.g. a "people's State") that men aim at, but their union, uniting, this ever-fluid uniting of everything standing. — A State exists even without my co-operation: I am born in it, brought up in it, under obligations to it, and must "do it homage." [huldigen] It takes me up into its "favor," [Huld] and I live by its "grace." Revolution and ins...