Seventh777Sevens

modernized Woodrow Wilsonism- Adam Susanism  also includes: Stalinism of the 21st century/ Big Brother / Liberal 2.0 Globalization 2.0, Democrat Supreme leader ideology, elective despotism government, FBI modern fascism

Da r k e   Dic tato rism  also includes Dark Left Joe Manchinism An idealistic and reformist version of Neoliberalism which tries to promote liberal 2.0 reforms and proaggressive agenda while avoiding politics which are too "Tea Partyish" or "low-ball", even if this means compromising with Neo Social Libertarians  thus folding on political goals.  Th ird W ay CCP ink   M ao ism

    Schröderism Collapse   Authoritarian Democracy   Corporatocracy   Economic Liberalism   Industrialism   Machiavellianism   Neo-Mercantilism [Note 6]   Interventionism  (Somewhat) [Note 7]   Kleptocracy   Radical Centrism   Putinversteher   Regulationist Capitalism   Social Authoritarianism   State Capitalism

Including Social Democratic parties that are Leftish Anti Communist and dissenters from Comintern 

Left interventionist ,  Cultu rally var iable ,  Post Fascist,  Russian Liberal Democracy, proto Fourth Poli tical Theory , Ultranational Conservativism, interwar Social Democracy / Social Corporatism

  Revolutionary Socialist Democracy / Classical Social Democracy

Soc ial   Mutua lism

  ( Social Mutalism left libertarian connections )

 I: Deleuze, Marx and Proudhon In the initial defense of Proudhon, it’s worth mentioning the trap that Marxists have time and time again fallen into. An irreparable historical reform ridden with a deep and fatal idolization doctrine surrounding Marx and Engels. Marxists today refuse to acknowledge whatsoever that Marx can and should be seen as an outdated philosopher from another time. Anarchy has continued its evolution as time has progressed since Proudhon’s work, whereas Marxism has remained stuck in it’s hole barking at itself about surplus extraction and party lines. Before defending Proudhon, we will seek to avoid this trap. Proudhon, as regarded by (some) anarchists, is a fundamental and influential thinker who had many good ideas, ones that can and should be brought to today. That being said, he had many flaws. He was, quite frankly, an anti semitic bigot. His understanding of Hegel was lacking, as was his understanding of social domination as it related to freedom. His concept

-  Mutu alist  reading of Deleuze & Guattari  Giles Deleuze was a staunch anti-capitalist, openly antagonistic towards markets (according to)? He drew his theories of surplus from Marxist literature, as well as his theories of mechanical production.  Felix Guattari was a self described communist who remained active in several organizations throughout his life, including those inspired by Maoism. France, during Deleuze’s time, had long abandoned Proudhonian thought — and yet the similarities between Deleuze and Proudhon are remarkable in several areas previously unexplored by the left. It’s worth a mention though; our project’s goal is not to be the most accurate to Deleuze or to Proudhon (how imaginative would that be)?  There are criticisms that can and should be made of both of these thinkers — but by using their thought in new and different ways, we can create a resistance previously unexplored by the anti-capitalist majority, and one we believe has real and tangible emancipator

Dark Mutualism includes Neoreactionaryism,  Landian Accelerationism, Neo-Mutualism, Neocameralism and Proudhonism Marxism below is bolded ,  Le ft   Li bert ar ianism  (also  Mutualist - Social Mutualist / Market-oriented   left libertarian ,  Left Wing  Fr ee   Mark et   An ar chi sm - anarchistic socialism [Benjamin Tuckerite , Kevin Carson-Roderick Long  Mutualism / Left Libertarianism ,   Agor ism ,  Austrian Fusion  related ideologies are underlined and slanted i’m definitely gonna need delving deeper into this Del Noce guy, because he sees the left’s options way clearer than anyone in the left in a good while have. dark mutualism, and LRx more generally , both fall squarely within the “reality principle” left described above. devising strategy and vision to embrace and follow capital into its extremity,  ultimately into machinic proletarian revolution , is the only thing that could possibly still make justice to any rigorous marxian or proudhonian analysis of history. "O