Neckcksussu
Similar to Matt Ridley's ideology
I support outsiders who band together in their individualistic struggle against society and in pursuance of their own curiosity, pride, and instinct against society.
After we rightfully remove all forms and structures of material domination, hierarchy and sovereignty, I would want (and I would others to want) to project positive influence (without hierarchy and authority) in a sweeping influential manner
Novatore's "Libertarian Aristocracy" (Anarchist vanguard)
I've been thinking quite a bit recently about Novatore's concept of the "libertarian aristocracy" (by which of course, this being Europe and it being 100 years ago, he meant "anarchistic aristocracy" (you owe us a word capitalists!)), and I'm interested in debating with folks about this concept -- (I'm trying to sharpen my thought on the matter).
Certainly on the surface I can see how the idea of an "anarchistic aristocracy" would seem preposterous. What on earth could an aristocrat or aristocracy have to do with anarchism?
But Novatore makes it clear that he does not have in mind a ruler. Rather, he has in mind those individuals with an uncompromising animosity for the authority of today, and who would continue that animosity onto the inevitable attempts by people in a state of resistance to construct new systems of authority. The aristocrats are those willing to stand apart and remain a rebel, even in opposition to yesterday's rebels. Shevek, the main character of LeGuin's The Dispossessed, always comes to my mind as a neatly drawn example of such a person.
To put it into Novatore's words:
Consequently, anarchy, which is the natural liberty of the individual freed from the odious yoke of spiritual and material rulers, is not the construction of a new and suffocating society.’ It is a decisive fight against all societies — christian, democratic, socialist, communist, etc., etc. Anarchism is the eternal struggle of a small minority of aristocratic outsiders against all societies which follow one another on the stage of history.
So that is Novatore's aristocrat.
Perhaps it is because I came to anarchism from Nietzsche, but I've always been quite charmed by this idea. However, I'd be interested in seeing and debating critiques of this position and/or of the constructiveness of Novatore's aristocrat.
revolution is the fire of our will and a need of our solitary minds; it is an obligation of the libertarian aristocracy. To create new ethical values. To create new aesthetic values. To communalize material wealth. To individualize spiritual wealth." Towards the creative nothing Archived nd adherents to anarcho-communism (Albert Libertad, illegalism and Renzo Novatore).[86] A
It would undermined the power of non-hereditary plutocrats
Comments
Post a Comment